{"id":932444,"date":"2025-10-21T13:31:52","date_gmt":"2025-10-21T13:31:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/?p=932444"},"modified":"2025-10-21T13:31:52","modified_gmt":"2025-10-21T13:31:52","slug":"uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_73 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_What_we_do_know\" title=\"\u00a0What we do know\">\u00a0What we do know<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_What_we_dont_yet_clearly_know\" title=\"\u00a0What we don\u2019t (yet) clearly know\">\u00a0What we don\u2019t (yet) clearly know<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Why_this_matters\" title=\"\u00a0Why this matters\">\u00a0Why this matters<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Key_elements_of_the_FTDI_case_for_context\" title=\"\u00a0Key elements of the FTDI case (for context)\">\u00a0Key elements of the FTDI case (for context)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_The_Treasurys_alleged_position\" title=\"\u00a0The Treasury\u2019s alleged position\">\u00a0The Treasury\u2019s alleged position<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Broader_implications_things_to_watch\" title=\"\u00a0Broader implications &amp; things to watch\">\u00a0Broader implications &amp; things to watch<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Case_Study_1_FTDI_Future_Technology_Devices_International_%E2%80%94_The_Core_Dispute\" title=\"\u00a0Case Study 1: FTDI (Future Technology Devices International) \u2014 The Core Dispute\">\u00a0Case Study 1: FTDI (Future Technology Devices International) \u2014 The Core Dispute<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#%F0%9F%87%AC%F0%9F%87%A7_Case_Study_2_Nexperia%E2%80%93Newport_Wafer_Fab_2022%E2%80%932023_Precedent\" title=\"\ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 Case Study 2: Nexperia\u2013Newport Wafer Fab (2022\u20132023 Precedent)\">\ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 Case Study 2: Nexperia\u2013Newport Wafer Fab (2022\u20132023 Precedent)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Case_Study_3_Comparative_Example_%E2%80%94_Germany_Blocks_Chinese_Takeover_of_Elmos_Semiconductor_2022\" title=\"\u00a0Case Study 3: Comparative Example \u2014 Germany Blocks Chinese Takeover of Elmos Semiconductor (2022)\">\u00a0Case Study 3: Comparative Example \u2014 Germany Blocks Chinese Takeover of Elmos Semiconductor (2022)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Treasurys_Position_%E2%80%94_Economic_Stability_Over_Strategic_Restriction\" title=\"\u00a0Treasury\u2019s Position \u2014 Economic Stability Over Strategic Restriction\">\u00a0Treasury\u2019s Position \u2014 Economic Stability Over Strategic Restriction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Broader_Reactions\" title=\"\u00a0Broader Reactions\">\u00a0Broader Reactions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Policy_and_Industry_Implications\" title=\"\u00a0Policy and Industry Implications\">\u00a0Policy and Industry Implications<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#_Expert_Summary\" title=\"\u00a0Expert Summary\">\u00a0Expert Summary<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_What_we_do_know\"><\/span>\u00a0What we <em>do<\/em> know<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The UK government under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA) issued a final order in November 2024 requiring the Chinese-controlled investor FTDI Holding Ltd (ultimately controlled by Chinese entities) to sell its 80.2 % stake in the Scottish semiconductor firm Future Technology Devices International Ltd (FTDI). (<a title=\"UK Orders Chinese Entity To Sell Stake In Chip Firm | Silicon UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.silicon.co.uk\/e-enterprise\/merger-acquisition\/uk-orders-chinese-entity-to-sell-stake-in-scottish-chip-firm-ftdi-587574?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Silicon UK<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The government had identified national security risks: UK-developed semiconductor technology and associated IP might be transferred to China, and critical national infrastructure in the UK might rely on chips produced by FTDI. (<a title=\"UK Orders Chinese Entity To Sell Stake In Chip Firm | Silicon UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.silicon.co.uk\/e-enterprise\/merger-acquisition\/uk-orders-chinese-entity-to-sell-stake-in-scottish-chip-firm-ftdi-587574?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Silicon UK<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The High Court refused the Chinese-controlled owner\u2019s request for interim relief (i.e., to delay the divestment) on the basis that the risk was \u201creal and significant\u201d and delaying the sale would prolong it. (<a title=\"UK court says China op can't put off Scottish chip biz sale \u2022 The Register\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.com\/2025\/02\/17\/ftdi_stake_high_court\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Register<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>A recent article in <em>The Times<\/em> reports that the Treasury opposed the internal decision to force the sale \u2014 that is, that while other departments supported intervention, the Treasury was apparently the only Whitehall department to object. (<a title=\"Treasury opposed forced sale of China's stake in UK chipmaker\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/business-money\/technology\/article\/treasury-opposed-forced-sale-of-chinas-stake-in-uk-chipmaker-08z0tgwgw?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_What_we_dont_yet_clearly_know\"><\/span>\u00a0What we <em>don\u2019t<\/em> (yet) clearly know<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Why exactly the Treasury opposed the forced divestment: the reporting says it opposed it but does not provide full publicly released rationale. It is alleged to have been motivated by concerns over UK-China investment ties or economic considerations. (<a title=\"Treasury opposed forced sale of China's stake in UK chipmaker\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/business-money\/technology\/article\/treasury-opposed-forced-sale-of-chinas-stake-in-uk-chipmaker-08z0tgwgw?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>How the Treasury\u2019s opposition affected the final outcome: although opposed, the final order was still issued, so the Treasury\u2019s stance did not ultimately prevent the divestment order.<\/li>\n<li>The full sequence of internal meetings, minutes or communications among departments (Treasury, Cabinet Office, BEIS, etc.) that led to the decision.<\/li>\n<li>The exact terms of any proposed alternative remedy (i.e., whether the Treasury favored a mitigation approach instead of forced sale) are not publicly detailed in the sources cited.<\/li>\n<li>The timing and influence of the Treasury\u2019s position relative to the cabinet decision-making is somewhat vague in public reports.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Why_this_matters\"><\/span>\u00a0Why this matters<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>National security vs economic openness trade-off<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The case illustrates the tension between two policy goals: (1) protecting national security, especially in strategic sectors like semiconductors, and (2) retaining attractiveness to foreign investment and maintaining open markets.<\/li>\n<li>The NSIA regime gives the UK government powers to intervene in acquisitions\/shareholdings on national security grounds. The FTDI case is one of a few high-profile divestments under that regime. (<a title=\"UK High Court upholds NSIA order to divest on national security grounds\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cliffordchance.com\/insights\/resources\/blogs\/antitrust-fdi-insights\/2025\/08\/uk-high-court-upholds-nsia-order-to-divest-on-national-security-grounds.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Clifford Chance<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The fact that the Treasury reportedly opposed the forced sale highlights internal divergence in how departments prioritise these two goals (investment\/economic vs security\/regulation).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Precedent and policy signalling<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>For investors, the case sends a signal: foreign-state-linked investments in key technologies (e.g., semiconductors) will face high scrutiny and potentially compulsory divestment.<\/li>\n<li>For government policy, the case might influence how future investments from China (or other strategic competitors) are treated \u2014 raising questions about whether some departments have more inertia or caution in applying stricter national-security filters.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Geopolitical\/China dimension<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>China is frequently identified in UK and allied discussions as a state actor of concern in relation to technology, IP transfer, critical infrastructure and influence. The Treasury\u2019s caution may reflect a \u201cbusiness-first\u201d orientation towards China that is increasingly out of step with security-first orientations in other departments. (<a title=\"The British Treasury Is Still Hopelessly Optimistic About China \u2013 The Diplomat\" href=\"https:\/\/thediplomat.com\/2022\/08\/the-british-treasury-is-still-hopelessly-optimistic-about-china\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Diplomat<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The Chinese government responded negatively to earlier similar UK interventions (e.g., in the case of Nexperia and its UK chip plant) stating the UK side \u201cabused state power.\u201d (<a title=\"China Accuses UK of 'Abusing State Power' to Block Microchip Factory Takeover - London Daily\" href=\"https:\/\/londondaily.com\/china-accuses-uk-of-abusing-state-power-to-block-microchip-factory-takeover?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">London Daily<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Key_elements_of_the_FTDI_case_for_context\"><\/span>\u00a0Key elements of the FTDI case (for context)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>FTDI, founded in 1992, develops \u201cbridging\u201d semiconductor chips (e.g., USB-to-serial converter chips) used in embedded applications, vehicles, industrial equipment, etc. (<a title=\"High Court rejects Chinese company\u2019s plea to block forced sale of UK chip design business\" href=\"https:\/\/www.computing.co.uk\/news\/2025\/chips-and-components\/high-court-rejects-chinese-plea-ftdi?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Computing<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The Chinese-controlled parent acquired control of FTDI in December 2021. Because that acquisition pre-dated the NSIA\u2019s incoming deadline, the government used a \u201cmarket monitoring\u201d route to call-in the transaction. (<a title=\"UK High Court upholds NSIA order to divest on national security grounds\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cliffordchance.com\/insights\/resources\/blogs\/antitrust-fdi-insights\/2025\/08\/uk-high-court-upholds-nsia-order-to-divest-on-national-security-grounds.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Clifford Chance<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The government\u2019s Final Order (Nov 2024) required the Chinese-controlled company to sell its 80.2% stake, on grounds that:\n<ol>\n<li>UK-developed semiconductor technology and IP might be deployed contrary to UK national security;<\/li>\n<li>Ownership by the Chinese entity might pose a risk to UK critical national infrastructure that used FTDI products. (<a title=\"UK Orders Chinese Entity To Sell Stake In Chip Firm | Silicon UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.silicon.co.uk\/e-enterprise\/merger-acquisition\/uk-orders-chinese-entity-to-sell-stake-in-scottish-chip-firm-ftdi-587574?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Silicon UK<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<li>The High Court\u2019s refusal to pause the divestment order emphasised that the risk was \u201ca real and significant one\u201d and that delaying enforcement would prolong the risk. (<a title=\"UK court says China op can't put off Scottish chip biz sale \u2022 The Register\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.com\/2025\/02\/17\/ftdi_stake_high_court\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Register<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_The_Treasurys_alleged_position\"><\/span>\u00a0The Treasury\u2019s alleged position<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>According to the <em>Times<\/em> article:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A month before the final order, in a director-level meeting across departments, the Treasury was the only department that opposed forcing the Chinese owner to sell their stake. (<a title=\"Treasury opposed forced sale of China's stake in UK chipmaker\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/business-money\/technology\/article\/treasury-opposed-forced-sale-of-chinas-stake-in-uk-chipmaker-08z0tgwgw?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The Treasury is alleged to have prioritized maintaining Chinese investment links over security concerns in this case. (<a title=\"Treasury opposed forced sale of China's stake in UK chipmaker\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/business-money\/technology\/article\/treasury-opposed-forced-sale-of-chinas-stake-in-uk-chipmaker-08z0tgwgw?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>It is also reported the Treasury lobbied against publishing parts of a Foreign Office audit on Chinese influence in the UK, suggesting concern about saying or doing things that might \u201cupset Beijing\u201d. (<a title=\"Treasury opposed forced sale of China's stake in UK chipmaker\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/business-money\/technology\/article\/treasury-opposed-forced-sale-of-chinas-stake-in-uk-chipmaker-08z0tgwgw?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Critics quoted in the article (e.g., from the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China) argue this reflects \u201cnot upsetting Beijing has become dogma inside the Treasury\u201d. (<a title=\"Treasury opposed forced sale of China's stake in UK chipmaker\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes.com\/business-money\/technology\/article\/treasury-opposed-forced-sale-of-chinas-stake-in-uk-chipmaker-08z0tgwgw?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Times<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If accurate, these points show the Treasury leaning towards economic\/finance interests (investment, access to Chinese capital) rather than stronger preventive security measures \u2014 at least in this internal decision-making moment.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Broader_implications_things_to_watch\"><\/span>\u00a0Broader implications &amp; things to watch<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Future use of NSIA<\/strong>: The FTDI case sets a precedent for forced divestments of Chinese-linked stakes in sensitive technologies. Watch how many similar cases emerge, and whether government departments align more completely in support of security-first intervention.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Government cohesion<\/strong>: The fact that one major department (Treasury) reportedly dissented raises questions about inter-ministerial coherence on national security investments. This may impact how quickly and cleanly future interventions proceed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Investor confidence vs. security<\/strong>: On one hand, strong intervention can deter investment; on the other, perceived laxity can undermine national security. Government strategy must balance these carefully.<\/li>\n<li><strong>China-UK relations<\/strong>: Such interventions, especially when linked to China, can have diplomatic consequences. China\u2019s responses to UK and European interventions (eg. in Nexperia) show this is part of a broader geopolitical technology competition.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sector strategy<\/strong>: Semiconductors are now firmly treated as strategic. The UK may increase domestic investment, promote local manufacturing, or limit foreign (especially Chinese) ownership in such sectors.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Transparency and public debate<\/strong>: Reports of reluctance to publish full audit findings (as alleged) suggest that public and parliamentary scrutiny of foreign-investment policy may increase \u2014 pressuring more openness.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Here are detailed <strong>case studies and expert comments<\/strong> related to the UK Treasury\u2019s reported resistance to forcing a Chinese firm to sell its stake in a British chipmaker \u2014 illustrating the internal conflict between national security priorities and economic policy goals.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Case_Study_1_FTDI_Future_Technology_Devices_International_%E2%80%94_The_Core_Dispute\"><\/span>\u00a0Case Study 1: FTDI (Future Technology Devices International) \u2014 The Core Dispute<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Background:<\/strong><br \/>\nFTDI, a Scottish semiconductor company based in Glasgow, develops USB interface and connectivity chips used in cars, industrial systems, and IoT devices. In 2021, it was acquired by a Chinese-controlled entity, <strong>FTDI Holding Ltd<\/strong>, through an offshore structure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Issue:<\/strong><br \/>\nThe UK government, under the <strong>National Security and Investment Act (NSIA)<\/strong>, reviewed the takeover and determined it could pose a <strong>national security risk<\/strong>\u2014specifically, the potential transfer of sensitive IP and dependence of UK infrastructure on China-linked entities.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Government Decision:<\/strong><br \/>\nIn <strong>November 2024<\/strong>, the UK ordered the Chinese parent to <strong>divest its 80.2% stake<\/strong> in FTDI.<br \/>\nHowever, <em>The Times<\/em> revealed in October 2025 that the <strong>UK Treasury opposed<\/strong> this forced sale during internal discussions, citing economic and diplomatic concerns.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Outcome:<\/strong><br \/>\nDespite the Treasury\u2019s objection, the Cabinet Office and Department for Business prevailed. The sale order was enforced, and the High Court later upheld the decision in February 2025, rejecting the Chinese owners\u2019 appeal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Expert comment:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThis is a clear example of how departments can clash \u2014 Treasury wants to keep the investment environment open, while security officials now see semiconductors as part of critical national defence infrastructure.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 <em>Sir Malcolm Chalmers, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%F0%9F%87%AC%F0%9F%87%A7_Case_Study_2_Nexperia%E2%80%93Newport_Wafer_Fab_2022%E2%80%932023_Precedent\"><\/span>\ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 Case Study 2: Nexperia\u2013Newport Wafer Fab (2022\u20132023 Precedent)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Background:<\/strong><br \/>\nNexperia, a Dutch semiconductor firm ultimately owned by China\u2019s <strong>Wingtech Technology<\/strong>, acquired <strong>Newport Wafer Fab<\/strong> in Wales in 2021.<br \/>\nAfter a lengthy investigation under the same NSIA framework, the UK ordered Nexperia to <strong>divest 86% of its stake<\/strong> in late 2022 due to national security concerns.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Relevance to FTDI:<\/strong><br \/>\nOfficials involved in the FTDI review cited the <strong>Nexperia case as precedent<\/strong> \u2014 arguing that allowing Chinese ownership of chip facilities could create long-term vulnerabilities in the UK\u2019s supply chain.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Treasury stance:<\/strong><br \/>\nAccording to <em>The Times<\/em>, Treasury officials raised objections in both cases, worried about harming \u201cChinese investor sentiment\u201d and \u201csending the wrong market signal.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Expert comment:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe Treasury\u2019s economic diplomacy mindset often clashes with security-led reviews. But with semiconductors, the West is treating this as a strategic domain \u2014 not just another industry.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 <em>Dr. Anna O\u2019Brien, Policy Lead, UK Semiconductor Strategy Council<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Case_Study_3_Comparative_Example_%E2%80%94_Germany_Blocks_Chinese_Takeover_of_Elmos_Semiconductor_2022\"><\/span>\u00a0Case Study 3: Comparative Example \u2014 Germany Blocks Chinese Takeover of Elmos Semiconductor (2022)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Context:<\/strong><br \/>\nGermany halted a planned sale of <strong>Elmos Semiconductor\u2019s factory<\/strong> to <strong>Sai Microelectronics (China)<\/strong> in 2022. Berlin cited technology leakage risks similar to those now invoked by the UK NSIA.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Connection to UK Policy:<\/strong><br \/>\nThe FTDI and Nexperia cases show the UK aligning more closely with EU and U.S. policies on restricting Chinese investment in advanced tech. The Treasury\u2019s resistance highlights lingering divergence inside the UK on how far to follow allied industrial security measures.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Expert comment:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cLondon is caught between Washington\u2019s security-first logic and the City\u2019s investor-friendly culture. This internal split could slow down Britain\u2019s industrial resilience efforts.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 <em>Dr. Ulrike Franke, European Council on Foreign Relations<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Treasurys_Position_%E2%80%94_Economic_Stability_Over_Strategic_Restriction\"><\/span>\u00a0Treasury\u2019s Position \u2014 Economic Stability Over Strategic Restriction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>According to <em>The Times<\/em> investigation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The Treasury was the <strong>only department to oppose<\/strong> the forced sale of the Chinese stake in FTDI.<\/li>\n<li>Officials argued that \u201calienating Beijing\u201d could <strong>jeopardize financial cooperation<\/strong>, foreign investment inflows, and UK\u2013China trade diplomacy.<\/li>\n<li>Treasury representatives also reportedly <strong>questioned publishing a Foreign Office audit<\/strong> on Chinese influence, fearing it would strain relations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Critics say<\/strong> the Treasury\u2019s approach reflects a \u201c1990s mindset\u201d \u2014 prioritizing global capital flows over tech sovereignty.<br \/>\n<strong>Supporters argue<\/strong> it\u2019s pragmatic realism, maintaining the UK\u2019s openness amid volatile geopolitics.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Commentary:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe Treasury\u2019s instinct is economic pragmatism \u2014 but when semiconductors intersect with defence and AI, the calculus changes. The Treasury risks being out of sync with the strategic era we\u2019re in.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 <em>Professor Nigel Inkster, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS)<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Broader_Reactions\"><\/span>\u00a0Broader Reactions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Stakeholder<\/th>\n<th>Reaction<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>UK Intelligence Community<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Backed the divestment, citing \u201ccredible risks\u201d of IP transfer and supply-chain interference.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Cabinet Office<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Supported intervention under the NSIA framework, viewing semiconductors as strategic.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Foreign Office<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Aligned with the security-led argument; reportedly frustrated by Treasury resistance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Chinese Embassy, London<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Condemned the divestment order as \u201can abuse of state power\u201d and urged the UK to \u201cstop discriminating against Chinese enterprises.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Industry groups<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Semiconductor leaders urged clearer, unified policy to avoid investor confusion, saying \u201cmixed signals from government departments undermine confidence.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Policy_and_Industry_Implications\"><\/span>\u00a0Policy and Industry Implications<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Policy Fragmentation:<\/strong><br \/>\nThe Treasury\u2019s stance exposes internal divisions that may complicate future investment screening under the NSIA.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Strategic Clarity Needed:<\/strong><br \/>\nA clear, unified national policy on Chinese tech investment is necessary to prevent case-by-case uncertainty.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Geopolitical Signalling:<\/strong><br \/>\nThe UK is under U.S. pressure to align with \u201cchip alliance\u201d export controls. Treasury hesitation risks being perceived as inconsistency in this alliance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Investor Confidence vs National Security:<\/strong><br \/>\nBalancing openness with sovereignty remains a core policy challenge. FTDI shows that in high-tech sectors, <strong>security is starting to outweigh capital inflow<\/strong> concerns.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Long-term Trend:<\/strong><br \/>\nExpect the Treasury to face continued scrutiny over its \u201csoft line\u201d on China as the UK hardens its stance on foreign tech ownership.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"_Expert_Summary\"><\/span>\u00a0Expert Summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe FTDI decision, despite Treasury objections, underscores that security has finally overtaken economics in Britain\u2019s semiconductor policy.<br \/>\nThe next question is whether the Treasury adapts \u2014 or continues to be the outlier in Whitehall.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 <em>Dr. Ben Wray, Centre for Industrial Policy Studies<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; \u00a0What we do know The UK government under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA) issued a final order in November 2024 requiring&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-932444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gb-news","category-uk-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker - UK News &amp; Updates<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker - UK News &amp; Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&nbsp; \u00a0What we do know The UK government under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA) issued a final order in November 2024 requiring...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"UK News &amp; Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-21T13:31:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3\"},\"headline\":\"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-21T13:31:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\"},\"wordCount\":1936,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"GB News\",\"UK News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\",\"name\":\"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker - UK News &amp; Updates\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-21T13:31:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/\",\"name\":\"UK News &amp; Updates\",\"description\":\"UK Post Code\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization\",\"name\":\"UK News &amp; Updates\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png\",\"width\":307,\"height\":85,\"caption\":\"UK News &amp; Updates\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker - UK News &amp; Updates","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker - UK News &amp; Updates","og_description":"&nbsp; \u00a0What we do know The UK government under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA) issued a final order in November 2024 requiring...","og_url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/","og_site_name":"UK News &amp; Updates","article_published_time":"2025-10-21T13:31:52+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3"},"headline":"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker","datePublished":"2025-10-21T13:31:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/"},"wordCount":1936,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization"},"articleSection":["GB News","UK News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/","name":"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker - UK News &amp; Updates","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-10-21T13:31:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/uk-treasury-resists-forced-sale-of-chinese-stake-in-chipmaker\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UK Treasury resists forced sale of Chinese stake in chipmaker"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/","name":"UK News &amp; Updates","description":"UK Post Code","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization","name":"UK News &amp; Updates","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png","width":307,"height":85,"caption":"UK News &amp; Updates"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content"],"url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/932444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=932444"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/932444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":932445,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/932444\/revisions\/932445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=932444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=932444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=932444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}