{"id":905931,"date":"2025-09-30T14:42:05","date_gmt":"2025-09-30T14:42:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/?p=905931"},"modified":"2025-09-30T14:42:05","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T14:42:05","slug":"petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/","title":{"rendered":"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures &#8211; UK"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_73 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Overview_context\" title=\"Overview &amp; context\">Overview &amp; context<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Timeline_signature_growth\" title=\"Timeline &amp; signature growth\">Timeline &amp; signature growth<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Arguments_framing_what_signatories_are_saying\" title=\"Arguments &amp; framing: what signatories are saying\">Arguments &amp; framing: what signatories are saying<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Political_institutional_reactions\" title=\"Political &amp; institutional reactions\">Political &amp; institutional reactions<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Government_pro-BritCard_response\" title=\"Government \/ pro-BritCard response\">Government \/ pro-BritCard response<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Opposition_civil_liberties_groups_critics\" title=\"Opposition, civil liberties groups &amp; critics\">Opposition, civil liberties groups &amp; critics<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Media_experts_and_opinion\" title=\"Media, experts and opinion\">Media, experts and opinion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Comparative_precedent_insights\" title=\"Comparative &amp; precedent insights\">Comparative &amp; precedent insights<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#What_is_the_petition_trying_to_achieve_and_how_likely_is_impact\" title=\"What is the petition trying to achieve, and how likely is impact?\">What is the petition trying to achieve, and how likely is impact?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Goals_of_the_petition\" title=\"Goals of the petition\">Goals of the petition<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#How_much_real_policy_impact\" title=\"How much real policy impact?\">How much real policy impact?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Risks_challenges_counters_arising_from_the_petition\" title=\"Risks, challenges &amp; counters arising from the petition\">Risks, challenges &amp; counters arising from the petition<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#What_to_watch_next_key_metrics_events\" title=\"What to watch next (key metrics &amp; events)\">What to watch next (key metrics &amp; events)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Sample_voices_commentary\" title=\"Sample voices &amp; commentary\">Sample voices &amp; commentary<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Possible_outcomes_scenarios\" title=\"Possible outcomes &amp; scenarios\">Possible outcomes &amp; scenarios<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Why_this_petition_matters_beyond_symbolism\" title=\"Why this petition matters beyond symbolism\">Why this petition matters beyond symbolism<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Key_Facts_Examples\" title=\"Key Facts \/ Examples\">Key Facts \/ Examples<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Case_Studies_Comparisons\" title=\"Case Studies &amp; Comparisons\">Case Studies &amp; Comparisons<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Comments_Arguments_Themes\" title=\"Comments, Arguments &amp; Themes\">Comments, Arguments &amp; Themes<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#Examples_of_Where_Opposition_Has_Shaped_or_Modified_Proposals\" title=\"Examples of Where Opposition Has Shaped or Modified Proposals\">Examples of Where Opposition Has Shaped or Modified Proposals<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#What_These_Examples_Suggest_about_Possible_Outcomes_Lessons\" title=\"What These Examples Suggest about Possible Outcomes &amp; Lessons\">What These Examples Suggest about Possible Outcomes &amp; Lessons<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Overview_context\"><\/span>Overview &amp; context<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>In late September 2025, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his government formally unveiled plans to introduce a digital identity system (often referred to as \u201cBritCard\u201d) that would be required for various official checks \u2014 most notably <strong>Right to Work<\/strong>. The government frames it as part of its strategy to curb illegal employment, strengthen border security, and modernise identity verification. (<a title=\"New digital ID scheme to be rolled out across UK - GOV.UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/new-digital-id-scheme-to-be-rolled-out-across-uk?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">GOV.UK<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Almost immediately, a petition titled <strong>\u201cDo not introduce Digital ID cards\u201d<\/strong> was launched on the UK Parliament\u2019s official petitions platform, expressing opposition to what signatories characterize as an intrusive, state-controlled identity scheme. Within days, the petition\u2019s signatures surged past one million and, as of the latest data, have climbed well beyond 1.6 million \u2014 and indeed some platforms report over 2 million signatures. (<a title=\"Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?ref=ed_direct&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Because in the UK system petitions that exceed certain thresholds (notably 100,000 signatures) are eligible to be considered for debate in Parliament, this petition\u2019s large scale places it squarely in the political spotlight. (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>What follows is a deeper dive into how this petition gained traction, the arguments made by its backers and opponents, legal and political constraints, comparisons, and what might happen next.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Timeline_signature_growth\"><\/span>Timeline &amp; signature growth<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Launch &amp; rapid growth<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The petition <strong>\u201cDo not introduce Digital ID cards\u201d<\/strong> was posted on the UK Parliament petitions site. (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>In its description, it states:<br \/>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cWe think this would be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control, and that no one should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system. We oppose the creation of any national ID system. ID cards were scrapped in 2010, in our view for good reason.\u201d (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n<li>As the government\u2019s announcement was made public, the petition attracted huge numbers rapidly: for example, by 1\u20132 days after the announcement media outlets reported that it had surpassed 1.5 million signatures. (<a title=\"More than 1.5 million people oppose digital ID cards. Here's why\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/bulletin\/news\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-b2834819.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Some recent counts show the petition now reaching over <strong>2.6 million<\/strong> signatures. (<a title=\"Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?ref=ed_direct&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Thresholds &amp; parliamentary procedure<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The UK petitions system works such that a petition reaching 10,000 signatures triggers a requirement for a government response, and at 100,000 signatures it is considered by the House of Commons Petitions Committee for potential debate. (<a title=\"Petitions - UK Government and Parliament\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>By far exceeding the 100,000 mark, this petition qualifies for debate, meaning it cannot be dismissed automatically. However, securing a debate does not guarantee that the government will change policy. (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?ref=ed_direct%3Fref%3Ded_direct&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The petitions platform also shows geographical breakdowns (by constituency) of signatures, allowing MPs to see the degree of local opposition. (<a title=\"Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?ref=ed_direct&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Thus, the petition\u2019s success is not only symbolic but has procedural weight in the UK\u2019s parliamentary system.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Arguments_framing_what_signatories_are_saying\"><\/span>Arguments &amp; framing: what signatories are saying<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The petition\u2019s text and supporting discourse suggest multiple lines of objection. These reflect both principled objections and pragmatic concerns. Here are the main ones:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Mass surveillance \/ state control<\/strong><br \/>\nThe petition claims that a compulsory digital ID system would enable a form of state surveillance and digital control \u2014 capturing and linking individuals\u2019 data more comprehensively than existing IDs. (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<br \/>\nCritics argue that multi-purpose digital ID can lead to \u201cmission creep\u201d \u2014 i.e. expansion beyond intended uses (Right to Work) into areas like health, taxation or social services. (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Freedom of choice \/ compulsion<\/strong><br \/>\nMany signatories object to the idea of being <em>forced<\/em> into registering or carrying a digital ID. The petition says \u201cno one should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system.\u201d (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<br \/>\nThe compulsion element (tying it to work, renting, services) raises concerns that people will be coerced into using the system. Critics highlight that not everyone has a smartphone or digital access; mandating digital ID may exclude or penalize people who are already disadvantaged. (<a title=\"No to Labour's Digital ID - Liberal Democrats\" href=\"https:\/\/www.libdems.org.uk\/nodigitalid?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Liberal Democrats<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digital exclusion &amp; inequality<\/strong><br \/>\nOpponents warn that older people, people in poverty, homeless people, people with disabilities, or those without digital devices may be unable or unwilling to use the digital ID, risking exclusion from work, housing or services. (<a title=\"No to Labour's Digital ID - Liberal Democrats\" href=\"https:\/\/www.libdems.org.uk\/nodigitalid?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Liberal Democrats<\/a>)<br \/>\nThe government has said it will design fallback mechanisms and ensure inclusion, but critics question whether those will be effective in practice. (<a title=\"New digital ID scheme to be rolled out across UK - GOV.UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/new-digital-id-scheme-to-be-rolled-out-across-uk?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">GOV.UK<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Privacy, data protection &amp; security risk<\/strong><br \/>\nA recurring theme is concern over data privacy, what data is stored, how secure it will be, and who can access it. Critics ask: how will the system prevent breaches, misuse, or insider threats? (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<br \/>\nA centralized or highly interconnected identity database is often seen as a &#8220;honeypot&#8221; for hackers. A breach affecting such a system could expose sensitive information at large scale. (<a title=\"Why We Must Oppose Digital ID Cards - Artificial Lawyer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.artificiallawyer.com\/2025\/09\/29\/why-we-must-oppose-digital-id-cards\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Artificial Lawyer<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Effectiveness doubts \/ policy mismatch<\/strong><br \/>\nSome signatories argue that the scheme will not materially reduce illegal work or immigration \u2014 that the real drivers (employer demand, smuggling networks) are not addressed simply by ID. Critics say it is a symbolic measure rather than a solution. (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<br \/>\nOthers point out that existing systems already require some forms of identity (NI number, passport, driving licence) and that a new super-ID is redundant. (<a title=\"Why We Must Oppose Digital ID Cards - Artificial Lawyer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.artificiallawyer.com\/2025\/09\/29\/why-we-must-oppose-digital-id-cards\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Artificial Lawyer<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Historical memory \/ precedent<\/strong><br \/>\nMany commenters refer to the failed or shelved national ID card proposals in UK political history (e.g. under Blair) as cautionary precedent: earlier resistance on civil liberties and public trust. (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<br \/>\nThey argue that introducing a compulsory digital ID echoes those past debates and may revive old concerns. (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Constitutional \/ devolved issues<\/strong><br \/>\nSome in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales object on the grounds that identity and administrative systems are in part devolved, and they raise questions about how BritCard would operate across jurisdictions. They also express concern about nationalist identity \u2014 e.g. forcing people to \u201cdeclare themselves British\u201d or complicating dual identities. (<a title=\"BritCard\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/BritCard?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Wikipedia<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>These arguments, combined, have fueled a broad, cross-ideological coalition of opposition, ranging from civil liberties groups to opposition parties to some within Labour itself.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Political_institutional_reactions\"><\/span>Political &amp; institutional reactions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Government_pro-BritCard_response\"><\/span>Government \/ pro-BritCard response<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The government argues the digital ID is not intended to be intrusive but is necessary for modernization, efficiency and to crack down on illegal working. The official announcement states:<br \/>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cA new digital ID scheme will help combat illegal working while making it easier for the vast majority of people to use vital government services. Digital ID will be mandatory for Right to Work checks by the end of the Parliament.\u201d (<a title=\"New digital ID scheme to be rolled out across UK - GOV.UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/new-digital-id-scheme-to-be-rolled-out-across-uk?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">GOV.UK<\/a>)<br \/>\n\u201cThere will be no requirement for individuals to carry their ID or be asked to produce it \u2014 but digital ID will be mandatory as a means of proving your Right to Work.\u201d (<a title=\"New digital ID scheme to be rolled out across UK - GOV.UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/new-digital-id-scheme-to-be-rolled-out-across-uk?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">GOV.UK<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n<li>Prime Minister Starmer has defended the scheme by saying that a \u201csecure border and controlled migration are reasonable demands\u201d and that digital ID can help enforce that. (<a title=\"New digital ID scheme to be rolled out across UK - GOV.UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/new-digital-id-scheme-to-be-rolled-out-across-uk?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">GOV.UK<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The government also highlights inclusion plans in its announcement, promising support for those who may not be digitally adept, fallback mechanisms, outreach, and consultation. (<a title=\"New digital ID scheme to be rolled out across UK - GOV.UK\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/new-digital-id-scheme-to-be-rolled-out-across-uk?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">GOV.UK<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Opposition_civil_liberties_groups_critics\"><\/span>Opposition, civil liberties groups &amp; critics<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Groups such as Big Brother Watch have been vocal. Silkie Carlo (director) warned the system could create a \u201cdomestic mass surveillance infrastructure\u201d and expose \u201csensitive information\u201d about all citizens to government databases. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Rebecca Vincent from Big Brother Watch warned the scheme could be \u201cuniquely harmful to privacy, equality and civil liberties.\u201d (<a title=\"UK politics live: Senior Tory MP warns over 'dangerous' digital IDs ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/politics\/digital-id-uk-brit-card-starmer-latest-news-b2833728.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Other civil liberties and human rights organizations \u2014 Liberty, Article 19, Runnymede Trust, Connected by Data \u2014 have signed letters urging caution or opposing forcing mandatory digital ID. (<a title=\"UK politics live: Senior Tory MP warns over 'dangerous' digital IDs ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/politics\/digital-id-uk-brit-card-starmer-latest-news-b2833728.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Opposition parties:\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Conservatives<\/strong>: Leader Kemi Badenoch has pledged to oppose mandatory ID on law-abiding citizens. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reform UK<\/strong>: Nigel Farage called it an \u201canti-British card\u201d and accused the government of using it to increase state control without addressing real migration issues. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Liberal Democrats<\/strong>: Published an opposition page, saying the policy threatens privacy and will burden digitally excluded groups. (<a title=\"No to Labour's Digital ID - Liberal Democrats\" href=\"https:\/\/www.libdems.org.uk\/nodigitalid?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Liberal Democrats<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Some Labour MPs (from the left) have also expressed unease, citing civil liberties concerns and questioning whether the proposal was included in the party\u2019s original mandate. (<a title=\"BritCard\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/BritCard?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Wikipedia<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Devolved governments in Scotland and Northern Ireland have signaled objection or caution. They warn of constitutional implications and identity sensitivities. (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards smashes 2 million\u2026 - inkl\" href=\"https:\/\/www.inkl.com\/news\/petition-against-digital-id-cards-smashes-2-million-signatures-milestone?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">inkl<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Media_experts_and_opinion\"><\/span>Media, experts and opinion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The Guardian, Al Jazeera and other major media have covered the petition\u2019s rise, framing it as a significant pushback against the government\u2019s digital ID proposals. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Al Jazeera noted that despite historical resistance, polling suggests 57% support a national identity scheme (though caveats apply) \u2014 indicating a complex public sentiment. (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The Independent runs an article, <em>\u201cMore than 1.5 million people oppose digital ID cards. Here\u2019s why\u201d<\/em>, summarizing arguments and reactions. (<a title=\"More than 1.5 million people oppose digital ID cards. Here's why\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/bulletin\/news\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-b2834819.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Legal and tech commentators (e.g. the blog <em>Artificial Lawyer<\/em>) argue that the proposal is unnecessary and threatens privacy and civil liberties, especially given existing identity systems (NI, passports, driving licences). (<a title=\"Why We Must Oppose Digital ID Cards - Artificial Lawyer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.artificiallawyer.com\/2025\/09\/29\/why-we-must-oppose-digital-id-cards\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Artificial Lawyer<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Thus, the petition has become a focal point in the broader public debate on civil liberties, modernization, and the balance between security and personal freedom.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Comparative_precedent_insights\"><\/span>Comparative &amp; precedent insights<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The petition\u2019s strength echoes earlier high-profile petitions and public resistance to identity schemes. Some relevant comparisons:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In <strong>2019<\/strong>, the petition to <strong>revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU<\/strong> gathered over 6 million signatures \u2014 the most-signed UK Parliament petition on record. That showed that online mobilization can reach surprising scale. (<a title=\"Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU petition\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Revoke_Article_50_and_remain_in_the_EU_petition?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Wikipedia<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>In the 2000s, the UK\u2019s earlier proposals for national ID \/ identity cards encountered strong public and parliamentary resistance, ultimately being scrapped. That legacy is frequently invoked by petitioners and commentators. (<a title=\"Why is the UK introducing digital IDs \u2013 and why are they so ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2025\/9\/29\/why-is-the-uk-introducing-digital-ids-and-why-are-they-so-controversial?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Al Jazeera<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Internationally, digital ID systems are controversial. Countries like India (Aadhaar) or Estonia have had both successes and major criticisms over data privacy, exclusion and surveillance risk. Though not always in petition form, public backlash in some jurisdictions has led to regulatory pushbacks. (These cases are referenced in broader commentary on digital ID).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In sum, the petition is not just an isolated activism moment \u2014 it aligns with historical skepticism in the UK and global caution about state identity systems.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_is_the_petition_trying_to_achieve_and_how_likely_is_impact\"><\/span>What is the petition trying to achieve, and how likely is impact?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Goals_of_the_petition\"><\/span>Goals of the petition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Policy reversal or abandonment<\/strong> \u2014 the clearest demand is that the government commits <em>not<\/em> to introducing digital ID cards. (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Public debate &amp; scrutiny<\/strong> \u2014 by hitting thresholds, the petition forces the issue into parliamentary consideration, media attention, and political accountability.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Mobilizing political pressure<\/strong> \u2014 large numbers of constituents pushing MPs may influence votes or appointments, especially in marginal seats or within parties.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shaping framing and narrative<\/strong> \u2014 by collecting and aggregating objections, the petition helps set the terms of public discourse (privacy, surveillance, exclusion).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_much_real_policy_impact\"><\/span>How much real policy impact?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>There are several constraints and limits:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Getting debated in Parliament does not guarantee a change of course. The government may respond formally, debate, but still push ahead. Historical precedent shows many debated petitions have not forced policy U-turns.<\/li>\n<li>The size of petition is politically potent but not determinative. Governments may weigh competing priorities, security narratives, and electoral trade-offs more heavily than the petition.<\/li>\n<li>The government already has a mandate (from its electoral victory) to pursue its agenda; it may consider the digital ID policy as part of its platform.<\/li>\n<li>The speed of implementation is uncertain; even if some resistance slows or modifies the law, legislation, technical design, and pilot phases may proceed gradually.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>But the petition raises the political cost of proceeding without strong safeguards or modifications. It makes outright dismissal harder.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Risks_challenges_counters_arising_from_the_petition\"><\/span>Risks, challenges &amp; counters arising from the petition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Because the petition has grown so strongly, a number of risk areas emerge for the government\u2019s digital ID plans:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Political legitimacy &amp; backlash<\/strong><br \/>\nProceeding despite large public opposition can fuel narratives of technocracy or overreach, especially among moderates and civil libertarians. The government may come under pressure to water down or slow the plan.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Parliamentary pressure<\/strong><br \/>\nMPs, especially in constituencies where many constituents have signed, may press for amendments, protections, or even blocking clauses. Internal dissent within the ruling party may grow.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Legal &amp; constitutional challenges<\/strong><br \/>\nOpponents may bring judicial review or constitutional arguments, especially around data rights, privacy law, or devolution. The petition\u2019s prominence gives legal challengers more public legitimacy.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Design compromises &amp; weakening<\/strong><br \/>\nTo mollify concerns, the government may be forced to scale back the \u201cmandatory\u201d aspects, limit data scope, ensure robust opt-outs\/fallbacks \u2014 which may reduce the system\u2019s effectiveness or political appeal.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Delays or phased rollouts<\/strong><br \/>\nThe backlash may force pilots, impact assessments, or extended consultation phases, delaying full rollout or pushing back deadlines.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reputational risk if mishandled<\/strong><br \/>\nIf rollout is botched (e.g. data breach, exclusion, false rejections), the government may pay higher political cost given the existing groundswell of opposition.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_to_watch_next_key_metrics_events\"><\/span>What to watch next (key metrics &amp; events)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Government response \/ formal reply to the petition<\/strong><br \/>\nUnder rules, the government must respond when a petition crosses 10,000 signatures; the timing, tone, and substance of that response will matter.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Parliamentary debate<\/strong><br \/>\nWhether the petition is scheduled for a debate, and how vigorous the debate is. Will MPs call for amendments or block rules.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Draft legislation \/ bills presented<\/strong><br \/>\nWhen a bill detailing the digital ID scheme is introduced, it will open the design details to scrutiny \u2014 scope, data, enforcement, opt-outs \u2014 and that is where much of the contest will shift.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Public consultation &amp; design documents<\/strong><br \/>\nLook for white papers, consultations, or technical design proposals. Opponents will push for strict safeguards, impact assessments (on privacy, equality, digital exclusion).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Security audits \/ independent reviews<\/strong><br \/>\nAs the scheme is developed, third-party security and privacy reviews will likely be demanded; leaks or red flags in those could amplify opposition.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Uptake \/ pilot results<\/strong><br \/>\nIn early stages, how smoothly pilots operate, number of rejections\/false positives, accessibility for non-digitally enabled groups.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Media &amp; civil society mobilization<\/strong><br \/>\nWhether the petition continues to grow, whether protests or campaigns (offline) mobilize, and whether opposition coalesces into legal challenges.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Electoral \/ political pressure<\/strong><br \/>\nWhether opposition parties, or dissenting MPs in the governing party, use the petition as a lever in debates, by-elections, or local campaigns.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sample_voices_commentary\"><\/span>Sample voices &amp; commentary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe mandatory digital ID scheme called \u2018BritCard\u2019 would make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about our daily lives. This system would fundamentally change the nature of our relationship with the state.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 from commentary published in <em>Artificial Lawyer<\/em> (<a title=\"Why We Must Oppose Digital ID Cards - Artificial Lawyer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.artificiallawyer.com\/2025\/09\/29\/why-we-must-oppose-digital-id-cards\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Artificial Lawyer<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cWe think this would be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control \u2026 no one should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 Petition text itself (<a title=\"Do not introduce Digital ID cards - Petitions\" href=\"https:\/\/petition.parliament.uk\/petitions\/730194?s=35&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Petitions &#8211; UK Government and Parliament<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cMandatory digital ID is highly unlikely to achieve the Government\u2019s objective of tackling unauthorised immigration.\u201d<br \/>\n\u2014 Letter from civil liberties organizations quoted in press coverage (<a title=\"UK politics live: Senior Tory MP warns over 'dangerous' digital IDs ...\" href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/politics\/digital-id-uk-brit-card-starmer-latest-news-b2833728.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Conservative leader\u2019s position: \u201cWe will oppose any push by the government to impose mandatory ID cards on law-abiding citizens.\u201d (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>These voices help narrate the stakes: individuals, civil society, politicians, and critics all using the petition to sharpen the political contest around digital identity.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Possible_outcomes_scenarios\"><\/span>Possible outcomes &amp; scenarios<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Given the petition\u2019s scale and the contested nature of digital ID, several plausible scenarios emerge:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Scenario<\/th>\n<th>What changes \/ results<\/th>\n<th>Pros &amp; cons<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Softening \/ compromise<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>The government proceeds but scales back mandatory reach (only for new hires, not retroactive), strengthens fallback mechanisms, limits data scope, adds stronger oversight and opt-outs<\/td>\n<td>Pro: may defuse much opposition while preserving core ambition. Con: weaker enforcement, perceived compromise of \u201ctoughness.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Slower, phased rollout<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Extensive pilot programs, delays in full implementation, incremental expansion<\/td>\n<td>Pro: gives time to fix design, build trust, reduce errors. Con: opponents may continue to criticize delays \/ \u201cdithering.\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Policy reversal \/ abandonment<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Under pressure, the government retreats, removes mandatory aspects, or drops the scheme altogether<\/td>\n<td>Pro: avoids deep conflict, retains political capital. Con: political cost of admitting defeat, may be criticized as backtracking.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Legislative confrontation<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>The scheme is pushed through with minimal amendment, triggering court challenges, intense opposition, reputational risk<\/td>\n<td>Pro: achieves maximum policy clarity and direction. Con: high political and legal risk, potential backlash.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Which path is chosen will depend on how strong the petition\u2019s political leverage becomes, how vocal MPs are, how stable the government feels, and whether initial design leaks or pilot issues shift the balance.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_this_petition_matters_beyond_symbolism\"><\/span>Why this petition matters beyond symbolism<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>It transforms what might have been a technical or administrative policy into a <strong>mass political issue<\/strong>, making civil liberties, privacy, identity and state power part of mainstream debate.<\/li>\n<li>It forces government and parliament to address design questions with public visibility. The petition\u2019s scale raises the political cost of ignoring or downplaying dissent.<\/li>\n<li>It channels opposition into structured mechanism \u2014 not just media commentary or protests, but a formal instrument in UK democracy.<\/li>\n<li>It gives MPs data on constituent sentiment (by locality) \u2014 which may influence voting behaviour or political positioning.<\/li>\n<li>It may delay or condition policy, especially if legal challenges or constitutional objections piggyback off the petition grounds.<\/li>\n<li>aised.<br \/>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Facts_Examples\"><\/span>Key Facts \/ Examples<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>The petition \u201cDo not introduce Digital ID cards\u201d is calling on the UK Government to drop its plans for mandatory digital ID cards. It crossed <strong>~1.5 million signatures<\/strong> by 27 September 2025. (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards receives 1.5 million signatures | The Independent\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/uk\/politics\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-starmer-b2834815.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>It gained thousands of signatures very quickly: e.g. \u201cmore than 6,800 signatures within a single hour\u201d as momentum spiked. (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards tops 1.5 million signatures | The latest National and International News - upday News\" href=\"https:\/\/www.upday.com\/uk\/politics\/petition-against-digital-id-cards-tops-15-million-signatures\/190ct4h?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">upday News<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>The petition text says (among other things):<br \/>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cWe think this would be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control, and that no one should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system.\u201d (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards receives 1.5 million signatures | The Independent\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/uk\/politics\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-starmer-b2834815.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n<li>Govt\u2019s position: the digital ID system would be mandatory for <em>right to work<\/em> checks by 2029 but people wouldn\u2019t have to carry a physical ID or show it in every context. It would be stored on smartphones. (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards tops 1.5 million signatures | The Independent\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/uk\/home-news\/government-id-cards-keir-starmer-nigel-farage-reform-uk-b2834789.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Political responses:<br \/>\n\u2022 Nigel Farage (Reform UK) called it an \u201canti-British card.\u201d (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards receives 1.5 million signatures | The Independent\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/uk\/politics\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-starmer-b2834815.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<br \/>\n\u2022 Tories (e.g. Kemi Badenoch) also opposed the idea of mandatory ID on law-abiding citizens. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<br \/>\n\u2022 Civil liberties groups (Big Brother Watch, etc.) have voiced strong concerns about surveillance, data security and privacy. Silkie Carlo (Big Brother Watch) said the proposal would lead to mass surveillance and hoarding of sensitive personal information. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Public perception \/ polling: there\u2019s no clear consensus; media reports note a mixture of worry, skepticism and curiosity. Some people see benefit (simpler identity checks, smoother public services), others fear overreach. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Studies_Comparisons\"><\/span>Case Studies &amp; Comparisons<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Here are comparisons and smaller examples that help illustrate how this kind of opposition plays out, and what lessons there are:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Previous UK ID \/ digital ID proposals<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>The UK had tried physical national ID cards under Tony Blair\u2019s government. That was scrapped, because of cost, civil liberties concerns, and political resistance. The memory of that is frequently raised in this current debate. Critics often draw parallels. (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards receives 1.5 million signatures | The Independent\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/uk\/politics\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-starmer-b2834815.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Similarly, earlier digital identity proposals have been opposed on grounds of privacy, digital exclusion, etc. These provide precedent for what opponents expect will go wrong.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>International analogues: what happens in other countries<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Countries like Estonia, India, etc., have advanced digital ID systems (or in India\u2019s case, Aadhaar). They show both the promise (efficiency, fraud reduction, simpler services) and also the pitfalls (data breaches, inclusion\/exclusion, legal challenges).<\/li>\n<li>For example, opponents often point to large-scale ID systems elsewhere where data was misused or \u201cmission creep\u201d happened\u2014initially limited identity checks expanded into health, policing or surveillance functions. This helps frame arguments in the UK context.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Public online debate \/ social media<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>On Reddit, Twitter etc., many users express concern about data security (\u201cone big database = big target\u201d), privacy, government overreach. Some worry about people without smartphones or stable digital access. Others dismiss the idea as unnecessary given existing IDs (passport, driving licence, NI number).<\/li>\n<li>Example from Reddit:<br \/>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cIt puts everyone\u2019s private data in one place \u2026 all it would take would be 1 successful hack \u2026 we already have valid ID \u2026 They say its to tackle illegal immigration, but if border control just did their job, it wouldn\u2019t be necessary. The whole idea is purely for control.\u201d (<a title=\"Petition against the UK digital id is well over 2 million signatures, I wasn't sure where else to post this, but im sure lots of fellow young uk people feel as strongly about this as I do, fight for your rights people \ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7\ud83c\udff4\udb40\udc67\udb40\udc62\udb40\udc65\udb40\udc6e\udb40\udc67\udb40\udc7f\ud83c\udff4\udb40\udc67\udb40\udc62\udb40\udc73\udb40\udc63\udb40\udc74\udb40\udc7f\ud83c\udff4\udb40\udc67\udb40\udc62\udb40\udc77\udb40\udc6c\udb40\udc73\udb40\udc7f\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/\/r\/teenagers\/comments\/1nsvtf1?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Reddit<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n<li>Also, some commenters point out that small employers\/employers who already don\u2019t follow rules might just ignore digital ID requirements too.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Comments_Arguments_Themes\"><\/span>Comments, Arguments &amp; Themes<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>From the petition, media, political debate, and public commentary, these are the major themes (with pros\/cons) that emerge as central to the opposition and concern:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th><strong>Argument<\/strong><\/th>\n<th><strong>Why people say it matters<\/strong><\/th>\n<th><strong>Possible counterpoints \/ Govt responses<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Mass surveillance \/ state overreach<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Fear that digital ID gives the state broad powers to track individuals, collect data in many domains (benefits, tax, health), potentially even beyond what\u2019s intended. Risk of \u201cmission creep.\u201d<\/td>\n<td>Govt claims use will be limited (right to work), not required for everything; strong data protection laws; oversight; no physical carrying; only certain verifications.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Data security \/ hacking risk<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>A centralized or highly interconnected identity system is a juicy target for hackers; if breached, could expose very sensitive personal data for many people. People fear loss of control over personal data.<\/td>\n<td>Government can commit to strong encryption, using existing verified identity systems; build in strict safeguards, audit trails, limiting data stored; regulatory oversight.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Digital exclusion \/ inequality<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Not everyone has smartphone or stable internet; elderly, homeless, disabled may struggle; language\/tech barriers. Risk of those people being excluded from work, housing, services.<\/td>\n<td>Govt can offer alternatives: physical options, in-person verification, maybe free\/low-cost devices or support; ensure fallback routes for people who can\u2019t use digital version.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Compulsion &amp; loss of freedom<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\u201cForced\u201d registrations are seen as un-British, an imposition; many signatories are upset by the idea that to work or rent someone may need this credential even if they believe they already have sufficient IDs.<\/td>\n<td>Govt says not all uses will require showing ID; usage is to verify certain legal status (i.e. right to work); not all adults or all interactions will demand producing the ID physically; aims to be limited\/mixed.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Effectiveness \/ policy mismatch<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Some believe that the scheme won&#8217;t much reduce illegal working or migration; that employers who are willing to break rules will still do so; that border control enforcement is more important. Also worry about duplicating existing checks.<\/td>\n<td>Govt could argue that this is one tool among many; that digital IDs will reduce forgery, speed up checks, reduce administrative burdens; that over time more services will integrate to make things simpler.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Constitutional \/ devolved concerns<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>In Northern Ireland especially, there are worries about how digital identity interacts with Irish citizenship, rights under the Good Friday Agreement; in Scotland, concerns about who controls identity; symbolic implications.<\/td>\n<td>Govt may need to design special arrangements \/ exemptions; ensure devolved governments are consulted; respect legal identities already in place; ensure dual identity rights respected.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Examples_of_Where_Opposition_Has_Shaped_or_Modified_Proposals\"><\/span>Examples of Where Opposition Has Shaped or Modified Proposals<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>While BritCard is new, there are early signs of how opposition is already influencing or may influence the policy:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Senior figures within the Labour Party and in government have begun to emphasize that people <em>won\u2019t be required<\/em> to carry physical IDs, and that the primary use will be for <em>Right to Work<\/em> checks, rather than forcing everyone in every situation. This framing appears to be in response to concerns about compulsion and overreach. (<a title=\"UK says it will introduce digital ID cards, reviving a contentious idea\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/03264e6728c88892b280afcd1323395b?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">AP News<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has made comments aimed at calming public fears, saying ministers do not intend to produce a \u201cdystopian mess.\u201d This suggests awareness that the proposal\u2019s optics and public trust are fragile. (<a title=\"More than 1.6m sign petition opposing Starmer's plan for digital ID cards\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/sep\/27\/petition-opposing-starmer-plan-digital-id-cards?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Guardian<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Opposition parties are using the petition and media backlash as leverage: making public statements, promising to oppose mandatory elements, etc., which increases political risk for the government. (<a title=\"Petition against digital ID cards receives 1.5 million signatures | The Independent\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-independent.com\/news\/uk\/politics\/petition-digital-id-cards-uk-starmer-b2834815.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">The Independent<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_These_Examples_Suggest_about_Possible_Outcomes_Lessons\"><\/span>What These Examples Suggest about Possible Outcomes &amp; Lessons<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Putting together the case studies and comments, here are lessons or predictions about how this debate might evolve, or how the petition might affect the policy:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Design will matter<\/strong>: The details of scope, what attributes are stored, how optional\/mandatory it is in different cases, fallback for non-digital users, limits on usage will likely be heavily contested and possibly shifted by opposition pressure.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Communication is crucial<\/strong>: Public misperceptions (or fears) may grow if the government does not make its safeguards clear early: what\u2019s mandatory vs optional; what data is stored; how privacy is protected; how individuals can verify, correct, and opt out; how the system is secured. Several critics already say lack of clarity.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Possible legal \/ constitutional pushback<\/strong>: Devolved governments (Scotland, NI, Wales) may demand modifications; legal challenges are possible if privacy law or rights law are thought compromised; especially with concerns from NI around Irish citizenship etc.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Petition \u2192 Parliamentary debate \u2192 Amendments<\/strong>: Because the petition has far exceeded 100,000 signatures, it must be considered for debate. That doesn\u2019t guarantee rewrites or blocking, but likely produce parliamentary scrutiny, possibly amendments.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pilots \/ phased rollout<\/strong>: The government may do pilot programmes first, narrow use cases (like Right to Work), before expanding, to test systems, build public trust, adjust based on feedback.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Political cost if missteps happen<\/strong>: If during rollout there are data breaches, exclusion, or high false rejection rates, public and media criticism will escalate. The petition helps keep those issues in spotlight.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Opponents may try to build alliances<\/strong>: Civil liberties groups, opposition parties, devolved governments, tech\/privacy experts, possibly business groups may align in opposing or demanding modifications, influencing parliamentary votes or public opinion.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<hr \/>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Overview &amp; context In late September 2025, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his government formally unveiled plans to introduce a digital identity system (often&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-905931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gb-news","category-uk-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures - UK - UK News &amp; Updates<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures - UK - UK News &amp; Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&nbsp; Overview &amp; context In late September 2025, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his government formally unveiled plans to introduce a digital identity system (often...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"UK News &amp; Updates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-30T14:42:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3\"},\"headline\":\"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures &#8211; UK\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-30T14:42:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\"},\"wordCount\":4182,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"GB News\",\"UK News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\",\"name\":\"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures - UK - UK News &amp; Updates\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-30T14:42:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures &#8211; UK\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/\",\"name\":\"UK News &amp; Updates\",\"description\":\"UK Post Code\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization\",\"name\":\"UK News &amp; Updates\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png\",\"width\":307,\"height\":85,\"caption\":\"UK News &amp; Updates\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures - UK - UK News &amp; Updates","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures - UK - UK News &amp; Updates","og_description":"&nbsp; Overview &amp; context In late September 2025, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his government formally unveiled plans to introduce a digital identity system (often...","og_url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/","og_site_name":"UK News &amp; Updates","article_published_time":"2025-09-30T14:42:05+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3"},"headline":"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures &#8211; UK","datePublished":"2025-09-30T14:42:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/"},"wordCount":4182,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization"},"articleSection":["GB News","UK News"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/","name":"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures - UK - UK News &amp; Updates","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-09-30T14:42:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/petition-against-digital-id-passes-1-6-million-signatures-uk\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"* Petition against digital ID passes 1.6 million signatures &#8211; UK"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/","name":"UK News &amp; Updates","description":"UK Post Code","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#organization","name":"UK News &amp; Updates","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-uk-logo-1.png","width":307,"height":85,"caption":"UK News &amp; Updates"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/5529805dee92503827c0c27ed13d55a3","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6aac6e3af4be1d6689e924bbaccd84fc0cc6c5f6680490dc6f0a1f09b87d57f1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content"],"url":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=905931"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905931\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":905932,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905931\/revisions\/905932"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=905931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=905931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukpostcode.org\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=905931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}