New funding launched to end the ‘postcode lottery’ in access to physical activit

Table of Contents

What is the “postcode‑lottery” for physical activity — and what’s the problem

When people say there is a “postcode lottery” for physical activity, they mean that where you live (i.e. your postcode) strongly influences whether you have good access to sports, exercise facilities, green space, or community‑based activity programmes.

In many deprived or high‑need areas, communities face high inactivity rates, lack of facilities, limited access to safe recreational spaces, or social / economic barriers that make regular exercise harder. (Sport England)
This creates a cycle: people living in poorer areas are less likely to be physically active, which affects health, well‑being, social mobility, and even life expectancy — all tied to “postcode.” (beactivebeds.co.uk)

The idea behind the new funding — and associated programmes — is to break this postcode‑dependency: ensure that no matter where someone lives, they have equal opportunity to be active, healthy, and socially included.

What’s the new funding — who’s behind it

The key driver of this push is Sport England. Recently they’ve announced a major expansion of what they call “Place Partnerships,” backed by a large public investment:

Sport England is investing £250 million of National Lottery and government (Exchequer) funding into over 90 places across England, through to 2028. (Sport England)
As part of the expansion, 27 new “places” (regions/communities) have just been added — these are local areas ranked among the top 20% nationally for social need, deprivation, health inequality and inactivity rates. (Sport England)
The funding isn’t just short‑term or one‑off: it supports a longer-term, place‑based approach — working with local authorities, community organisations, health bodies, sports clubs, and grassroots groups to build sustainable infrastructure for activity. (Sport England)

According to announcements, the aim is to ensure that “where you live does not dictate how long you live, or the opportunities you have to be active.” (Sport England)

How the funding is supposed to work — the “Place Partnership” model

Instead of funding random or individual projects, the “Place Partnerships” model is community‑driven and tailored to local needs. Here’s how it works:

For each target place (town, borough, district), Sport England partners with local organisations — including councils, voluntary groups, sports clubs, health bodies, youth organisations, faith groups, etc. (Sport England)
The partners — together with residents — design what activities or facilities are most needed locally: could be refurbished leisure centres, community halls, safe walking/cycling paths, youth clubs, inclusive sports programmes, programmes for older adults, etc. (beactivebeds.co.uk)
Over time, the model includes not just physical infrastructure but social interventions — outreach to inactive or underserved groups (young people, low‑income households, disabled people, minorities), affordable or free access, local leadership, and sustainable maintenance. (Sport England)
The funding includes both capital investments (facilities, infrastructure) and programmatic/social funding (clubs, outreach, community‑based activity creation). (Sport England)

The goal is systemic — not just a few lucky neighbourhoods — so that activity and sport become accessible everywhere, reducing inequalities tied to geography.

What supporters and officials say about it

Some of the key voices and their points:

Sport England’s chief executive said that making exercise “a normal part of life for everyone, all over the country” drives major social and economic value — with active lifestyles reportedly saving billions annually for the health system. (Sport England)
At local level, community‑based organisations (in newly funded areas) expressed enthusiasm: for example, in one of the new partner areas, local leaders said the funding is “recognition of need” — giving them a chance to “break down barriers to physical activity.” (beactivebeds.co.uk)
Many health experts and campaigners have long argued that a person’s postcode should not determine their health outcomes — this funding is widely seen as a forward step to making that ideal real, by focusing on inequality, deprivation and social need. (Sport England)

Real‑World & Community Impact: What Could Change

This kind of large, systemic investment — especially with its place‑based, community‑driven model — could shift power and opportunity by:

Improving accessibility: renewed or new sports facilities, community halls, safe spaces for play, youth clubs, walking/cycling infrastructure — meaning even residents in deprived areas get good-quality options.
Increasing inclusion: targeting groups often left out — young people, low‑income families, older adults, disabled residents, minorities — to make sport/physical activity accessible and welcoming.
Boosting health, wellbeing, and social cohesion: more people active, better physical and mental health, reduced social isolation, stronger communities.
Long‑term inequality reduction: over time, bridging gaps in health, longevity, social mobility — reducing disparities that stem from where someone lives.

Broader Context — Why This Matters Now

Recent data shows that inactivity is heavily correlated with deprivation: communities with social need have much higher inactivity rates than wealthier ones — meaning the “postcode lottery” in activity is widening health and social inequality. (beactivebeds.co.uk)
Also, the post-pandemic period has increased awareness of health inequalities and mental‑health burdens: access to sport and physical activity is increasingly seen as critical to public health and community resilience. (Sport England)
With this funding and the “Place Partnership” model, authorities are recognising that one‑size‑fits‑all national policies may not work — and that locally tailored, community‑designed solutions are far more effective.

Good question — there are real‑life case studies, community stories and public comments tied to the new funding launched to end the “postcode lottery” in access to physical activity. Much of this is driven by Sport England (SE)’s “place‑based” approach. Here’s a detailed breakdown with concrete examples, outcomes and reactions.

What is the new funding — quick recap

Sport England is investing £250 million (from National Lottery + government funding) into more than 90 “places” across England over the coming years. (Sport England)
This builds on the “Place Partnerships” model: long-term, community‑based partnerships with local authorities, grassroots organisations, councils, health providers — not short-term isolated projects. (Sport England)
The goal: to make sure where you live (your postcode) does not determine how easy or possible it is to be physically active. (Sport England)

Case Studies & Early Reported Impacts

Here are several concrete examples — from towns or regions already benefiting from funding — showing what’s being done and what’s changed.

Place / Community	What was done / What’s happening	Reported Outcome or Impact
Doncaster	Through a Place Partnership, local organisations delivered programmes to encourage activity among adults and children over several years. (leisureopportunities.co.uk)	Since 2015, adult activity increased: active adults rose from 53% to 58% — that’s ~17,000 more people becoming active. (leisureopportunities.co.uk)
Greater Manchester (children and young people)	Localised efforts to embed activity in communities — tailored to local needs rather than “one‑size‑fits‑all.” (leisureopportunities.co.uk)	Reported that for children and young people, activity levels rose above the national average. (leisureopportunities.co.uk)
Thurrock (in Essex) and neighbouring areas (Castle Point, Harlow, etc.)	Received targeted funding under the 2025 expansion; money is directed toward building/supporting community‑based sports and activity programmes. (thurrock.gov.uk)	Expected to increase physical activity, especially among children/young people, and help reduce inequalities linked to income and access. (thurrock.gov.uk)
Luton	After being selected among the new 27 “Place Partnerships,” local organisations (via Be Active) started working with communities to identify and remove barriers to participation. (beactivebeds.co.uk)	The plan is to co-create accessible, inclusive activities — meaning more people will have a chance to be active regardless of background or postcode. (beactivebeds.co.uk)

These cases show that the funding isn’t just theoretical — localities already involved are seeing shifts in activity levels, infrastructure improvements or more inclusive access to sport and exercise.

What Officials, Organisers & Community Leaders Say — Comments & Justification

The chair of Sport England said the aim is to make exercise “a normal part of life for everyone,” arguing that investment in community sport yields social and economic value. (Sport England)
In the words of one local organiser (on a partnership in a newly funded area): community‑led design is vital, because “every place is different” — a football club might suit one area, gentle dance classes for older people another, local walking groups somewhere else. (wired-gov.net)
Another supporter emphasised a key insight: a child’s postcode can predict health outcomes as strongly as genetics — which is why targeted, place-based funding is “so important.” (leisureopportunities.co.uk)
Local organisations that received new funding express excitement: for instance, the director of Be Active said they’re “thrilled” to be awarded funding to break down barriers to activity in Luton, by working directly with stakeholders to figure out what’s needed locally. (beactivebeds.co.uk)

Challenges and What the Funding Doesn’t Guarantee

While there’s optimism, there are also realistic caveats:

The improvements depend on local implementation — funding plus good community engagement plus sustained effort. If local partners can’t deliver, the benefits might lag.
Because of structural inequalities (income, infrastructure, demographics), results will vary by place — not all areas will see the same uptake or impact.
Some benefits (like building a culture of activity, long‑term lifestyle change) will take years to show up. The early boosts in Doncaster or Greater Manchester are promising — but sustained success means ongoing commitment.
There’s no guarantee that every individual will benefit: even if access improves, motivation, availability, personal barriers (time, family, work) still matter.

Why This Funding & Approach Matters — Bigger Picture

By focusing on place-based, not one‑size-fits-all, the programme acknowledges that inactivity is often rooted in social inequality, deprivation, lack of infrastructure or opportunity. This is a shift from simply offering “a facility somewhere” to building inclusive, community‑embedded activity ecosystems.
The approach aims not just at sport, but well‑being, social cohesion, inclusion, health equity — especially for children, older adults, disadvantaged communities, and places historically neglected.
Early results (like increased adult activity in Doncaster or children’s activity in Manchester) suggest that long-term transformation is possible — community by community.
In the long run, improving access to activity everywhere helps reduce health inequalities, possibly reducing strain on health/social‑care systems, boosting mental and physical health, and giving people better quality of life — regardless of where they live.