Hyndburn Council Leader Cancels £1 Million Leisure Grant Proposal

Author:

In a development that has sent ripples through the Hyndburn Council, Leader Cllr Munsif Dad announced the withdrawal of a proposed £1 million grant intended to support Hyndburn Leisure’s provision of community leisure services for the upcoming financial year. This announcement was made just as the council’s ruling cabinet was set to discuss the proposal as a late agenda item during their latest meeting on Wednesday afternoon. The decision has raised concerns among council members, particularly from the Conservative opposition group leader, Cllr Zak Khan, who voiced apprehensions regarding the financial viability of the authority and the impact on local leisure services.

The initial proposal sought to allocate the substantial sum of £1 million to Hyndburn Leisure to support its operations from April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, contingent upon the completion of a grant funding agreement. This funding was viewed as vital, especially in light of the current pressures faced by leisure providers across the country due to rising operational costs and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on local services. The report outlined a clear framework for how the funds would contribute to maintaining and improving leisure services in the borough, emphasizing the importance of affordable and accessible recreational facilities in fostering community health and well-being.

According to the report, prior to 2021, Hyndburn Council had consistently provided annual grants to Hyndburn Leisure to help cover its operating costs and to support the availability of play-and-pay sports and recreational amenities in the area. In 2008/09, the council allocated £1.2 million in grant funding to Hyndburn Leisure, underscoring the historical commitment of the authority to support local leisure initiatives. However, amid the austerity measures imposed by the government over the years, the council shifted its approach, encouraging Hyndburn Leisure to pursue financial independence. This led to a gradual reduction in subsidies, and by the 2021/22 financial year, the council ceased its financial support altogether as part of its broader strategy to foster self-sufficiency among local organizations.

Since then, Hyndburn Leisure, like many leisure providers, has encountered significant financial challenges. These pressures have stemmed from a variety of factors including soaring energy costs, increased staffing expenses, inflation-related price hikes on supplies and maintenance, rising irrecoverable VAT, and lost revenue resulting from the partial closure of Mercer Hall Leisure Centre. These financial woes have prompted the council to step in with a subsidy, with figures showing £235,000 provided to Hyndburn Leisure in the 2022/23 fiscal year, and an increased amount of £490,000 budgeted for 2023/24.

As the proposal was intended to establish a path forward for Hyndburn Leisure amidst these difficulties, Cllr Khan expressed serious concerns about the implications of withdrawing the funding request. He remarked, “My concern is this item being withdrawn. The subsidy should have been approved. £1 million is a significant sum. The question is whether not getting it will be fatal to Hyndburn Leisure, which does fantastic work to improve the health of the borough.” His statements reflect a growing unease among community leaders regarding the sustainability of local leisure services without sufficient financial backing, especially when considering the integral role these facilities play in promoting health and well-being in the community.

The opposition’s apprehension echoes broader conversations about the importance of community health initiatives and the necessity to provide residents with access to leisure services that promote physical activity and wellness. The closure or inability to maintain these facilities could exacerbate health inequalities within the borough, a situation that local leaders are determined to address. Cllr Khan’s concerns about the “potential lethality” of withdrawing financial support highlight the urgent need for strategic solutions to stabilize Hyndburn Leisure and ensure continued access to vital community services.

In response to the controversy surrounding the withdrawal, Cllr Dad explained, “The report was pulled for technical reasons and will be resubmitted in due course.” While this statement may offer some assurance that the matter is not permanently closed, it nonetheless leaves room for speculation about the future of Hyndburn Leisure and the council’s commitment to supporting local health and recreational initiatives. The uncertainty surrounding the grant raises questions about future funding strategies and the overall approach the council intends to take regarding its leisure services.

The potential ramifications of the council’s decision are significant. Hyndburn Leisure’s commitment to providing affordable and accessible leisure opportunities is central to the borough’s vision for improving public health outcomes. The funding was expected to aid not only in the maintenance of existing facilities but also in enhancing service offerings that would encourage more residents to engage with health and wellness programs. As the borough recovers from the challenges posed by the pandemic, investments in community services like leisure are critical to fostering a healthier population and enhancing quality of life.

Community engagement and public sentiment are critical factors influencing local governance, and the voices of Hyndburn’s residents must be taken into account as these discussions progress. If the council ultimately seeks to secure funding for Hyndburn Leisure, it will need to demonstrate to the public not only the necessity of these services but also how financial support translates into tangible benefits for the community. This might involve broader public consultations, stakeholder engagement, and transparent discussions about the financial health of local services.

Another aspect worth considering is the possible future reorganization of local government, which may influence how leisure services are funded and managed. Given the prospect of local government restructuring within the next two to three years, managing community leisure facilities may need to adapt in line with new governance structures. The report had recommended the continuation of existing management arrangements and urged Hyndburn Leisure to collaborate with the council on focusing their activities toward community service provisions, including a potential change of name and a review of their internal operations. However, the withdrawal of the grant raises questions about the path forward for such collaborative efforts.

As the discussions surrounding Hyndburn Leisure and community leisure funding evolve, it will be crucial for all stakeholders to remain engaged and advocate for the needs of residents. A clear roadmap for the future of leisure services in Hyndburn must be established, ensuring that funding and management strategies align with community needs and aspirations. By fostering collaboration between the council, local leisure providers, and the community, there is potential not only to stabilize current services but also to innovate and expand what is offered to residents.

The importance of addressing health inequalities in Hyndburn cannot be overstated, and investing in leisure services is a proactive step toward mitigating the broader social determinants of health. Careful consideration of the council’s financial commitments, alongside strategic planning for sustainable community services, can pave the way for a healthier and more active population.

In summary, the withdrawal of the £1 million grant proposal has initiated a critical conversation about the future of leisure services in Hyndburn and the financial pressures faced by local providers. While Cllr Dad’s comments indicate that the report will eventually be revisited, there is a pressing need for comprehensive strategies that emphasize the importance of community health and well-being. As the borough navigates these complexities, the focus must remain on ensuring that all residents have access to quality leisure services that enhance their lives and promote a healthier community overall.