Blanket “Bigi” Jackson, the youngest son of the late Michael Jackson, has reportedly taken legal action against his grandmother, Katherine Jackson, in a bid to safeguard his father’s legacy and estate. According to reports, the 22-year-old has filed legal documents to prevent his grandmother from using his father’s estate funds to finance an appeal of a previous court ruling.
Following his infrequent public appearance in Los Angeles, Blanket, also known as Prince Michael Jackson II, has attracted attention for his recent legal actions. Prior to filing his own legal papers, reports hinted at collaborative efforts between Blanket and his grandmother, Katherine Jackson, in opposing the estate executors’ plans for a significant business transaction. The specifics of this transaction remain undisclosed to the public, leaving room for speculation about its potential impact on Michael Jackson’s legacy and estate.
Blanket’s decision to file legal documents independently suggests a desire to assert control over his father’s estate and protect Michael Jackson’s legacy. Despite his young age, Blanket appears determined to safeguard his family’s interests and prevent any actions that could compromise his father’s estate. This move underscores Blanket’s commitment to preserving his father’s memory and ensuring that his estate is managed in accordance with his wishes.
While Blanket’s involvement in legal matters may come as a surprise to some, it reflects his growing maturity and sense of responsibility. As the youngest son of Michael Jackson, Blanket carries the weight of his father’s legacy and the responsibility to uphold it. By taking legal action to oppose the estate executors’ plans, Blanket demonstrates his dedication to honoring his father’s memory and protecting his interests.
Blanket’s decision to intervene in legal proceedings highlights the complexities of managing a high-profile estate and the importance of family involvement in such matters. Despite facing challenges and uncertainties, Blanket remains steadfast in his commitment to preserving his father’s legacy and ensuring that his wishes are respected. As he continues to navigate the complexities of estate management, Blanket’s actions serve as a testament to his unwavering dedication to his family and his father’s memory.
While the exact nature of the disputed transaction remains undisclosed, it is speculated to be linked to the estate’s deal with Sony to sell a portion of Michael Jackson’s music catalog for a reported $600 million. Despite Blanket and his grandmother presenting arguments against the deal, the court ruled against them, prompting Katherine Jackson to pursue an appeal. However, Blanket reportedly disagrees with her decision, expressing reluctance to utilize the estate’s funds for legal expenses.
Reports suggest that Blanket believes the appeal does not serve the best interests of the trust beneficiaries and does not feel that his father should bear the financial burden of the legal proceedings. He has petitioned the court to exercise discretion in granting reasonable attorney’s fees to his grandmother for expenses incurred prior to the appeal.
Last year, legal documents revealed that Blanket valued confidentiality regarding his stance, portraying him as a private individual who might have refrained from public statements to avoid their disclosure. However, his recent involvement in a court case has thrust him into the public eye, coinciding with backlash against an upcoming biopic accused of sanitizing assault allegations against Michael Jackson.
Director Dan Reed criticized the biopic, accusing it of attempting to downplay and dismiss allegations against Jackson. Reed alleged that the script overlooks instances where Jackson interacted with children in questionable circumstances, presenting him solely in a positive light. These allegations have ignited controversy and reopened debates surrounding Jackson’s legacy and the handling of accusations against him.