UK FCA Finalises Policy to Streamline Complaints Data Reporting

Table of Contents

1. What the FCA Has Finalised

The FCA has concluded its policy on complaints data reporting and put in place new rules aimed at making how firms report complaints data to the regulator simpler, more consistent and more useful for identifying risks to consumers.

Under the finalised policy:

Consolidation of Returns

A number of separate reporting returns which firms previously had to submit on complaints will be merged into a single complaints return.
This means firms no longer need to send multiple different forms — one consolidated return will capture all the required data, making submission easier and reducing duplication of effort. (FCA)

Standardised Reporting Frequency

Rather than varying schedules for different parts of complaints data, the new regime standardises the timing of reporting requests. Firms will know precisely when, and how often, they are required to send data.
This predictability helps firms plan resources and reduces administrative burden. (FCA)

Improved Data Quality & Contextual Publication

Firms with 500+ complaints in a reporting period must publish a summary of that data showing:
• number of complaints received;
• number closed;
• percent upheld;
• percent closed within eight weeks.
Contextual metrics (like number of customers or accounts) are recommended to help readers interpret the numbers fairly. (FCA)

Publication Approach

The FCA will publish firm‑level complaints data once participating firms confirm that their reported data accurately reflects what has been published. This supports transparency and peer comparisons. (FCA)

2. Why This Matters

Reduced Burden for Firms

By collapsing multiple data returns into one streamlined reporting process, regulated firms — from banks and insurers to investment firms — will spend less time on compliance bureaucracy and more on actual complaints handling. This addresses industry feedback that fragmented returns were onerous. (FCA)

Better Consumer Protection

Higher‑quality, standardised complaints data enables the FCA to:

Spot emerging problems earlier;
Target supervision where consumer harm risk is higher;
Benchmark firms’ complaints performance more reliably.
The changes align with the FCA’s broader goal of smarter, data‑driven regulation. (FCA)

Enhanced Transparency

Public publication of complaints data — including context — helps consumers compare firms and pressures firms to improve customer service. Firms that repeatedly show high complaint volumes or low resolution rates may face reputation risk. (FCA)

3. FCA’s Rationale: Official View

According to the FCA’s own statements, the overhaul:

Makes reporting simpler for the ~10,000 firms that report complaints data.
Improves data quality and consistency, so the regulator can respond faster to emerging risks.
Strengthens the regulator’s ability to spot patterns of poor conduct that could harm consumers.
Allows firms to plan ahead thanks to predictable reporting schedules. (FCA)

In the FCA’s words, the aim is to promote “smarter, more effective regulation” by aligning reporting requirements with practical reporting capabilities and better data utility. (FCA)

4. How the New Regime Works in Practice

Who Must Report and When

Firms regulated by the FCA that handle complaints must submit the harmonised return every six months.
Larger firms (with 500+ complaints) must publish their complaints summary. (FCA)

What Must Be Reported

For relevant firms, complaints summaries will include:

Totals of complaints received and closed;
Proportion upheld;
Timeliness of closure;
Categorisation of complaints by product or service type. (FCA)

Contextualisation Requirement

Firms are encouraged to include additional metrics (such as total customers or accounts) so that outsiders — including consumers and investors — can interpret the complaint figures with proper context. (FCA)

5. Expert & Industry Commentary

Positive Market Reaction

Industry experts have generally welcomed the streamlining:

Compliance professionals see it as a win for efficiency, as fewer overlapping forms reduce administrative complexity.
Consumer advocacy groups view the publication of complaints data as a strengthening of market accountability, enabling consumers to make more informed choices.
Regulators themselves have noted that better‑structured complaints data enhances their capacity to uncover systemic issues sooner. (FCA)

Potential Challenges

Some firms may need to update internal systems and data processes to align with the new consolidated format and ensure that contextual metrics are meaningful and accurate. Analysts also point out that transparent publication of complaints performance can be a reputational risk for firms that historically underperformed in consumer experience.

6. Context: FCA’s Broader Complaint‑Handling Landscape

The FCA’s complaints data reporting reform forms part of a wider regulatory trend:

There have been ongoing reviews of complaints handling and reporting rules to make them more consistent and useful for supervision. (FCA)
The FCA also monitors complaints trends such as volumes upheld and timeliness (e.g., past data shows persistent growth in total complaints), underscoring the need for quality reporting. (FCA)

7. What Comes Next

Firms must familiarise themselves with the new consolidated reporting format and submission timings.
Firms reporting high complaint volumes need to ensure their public summary reporting is accurate and contextually presented.
The FCA will monitor the new reporting framework’s effectiveness and may refine it further based on feedback and data quality assessments.

Summary

The FCA’s finalised policy on complaints data reporting:

Simplifies and consolidates multiple forms into one streamlined return.
Standardises frequency and improves data quality.
Requires meaningful public disclosure from larger complaint handlers.
Enhances the FCA’s ability to detect harmful trends and protect consumers. (FCA)

—

Here’s a case‑study and expert commentary look at the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) finalised policy to streamline complaints data reporting, with real examples and industry reactions on why these changes matter and what they mean in practice.

1. Policy Finalised: What Changed and Why

The FCA has finalised new rules that consolidate multiple complaints data returns into a single, streamlined reporting requirement for regulated firms. The goals are to:

Reduce duplication and administrative burdens for around 10,000 firms that report complaints data.
Standardise reporting frequency and make data more consistent and usable.
Improve the quality of data available, enabling the FCA to identify consumer harm more quickly.
Encourage firms to treat complaints as a source of insight for better outcomes, not just a compliance obligation. (FCA)

This follows the FCA’s consultation earlier in 2025 and reflects industry feedback that the previous regime was fragmented and unnecessarily complex. (FCA)

2. Case Study: How a Bank Might Use the New Reporting Framework

Scenario: A mid‑sized UK retail bank receives hundreds of customer complaints about its personal loan products over a six‑month period.

Old Approach:
Prior to the reforms, the bank would have submitted multiple distinct complaint returns covering different products, channels, and timeframes — a process that was time‑consuming and required duplication of effort across teams.

New Approach Under the FCA Policy:

The bank now reports all complaints data in one consolidated return that includes products such as personal loans, mortgages and credit cards in one place.
It must include breakdowns showing the number of complaints opened and closed, percentages upheld, and timeliness of resolution — for example, closed within eight weeks.
Optional context metrics (e.g., complaints per 1,000 customers) help both the FCA and public interpret the figures fairly. (FCA)

Result:

Faster internal analysis: Because the data is standardised, the bank’s compliance teams can spot trends (e.g., rising complaints on a specific product) earlier and take corrective action.
Better regulatory signalling: The FCA can more quickly flag systemic concerns across the industry.
Operational efficiency: Compliance resources are refocused from paperwork to analysis and remediation work.
Expert comment: Compliance executives generally view this as a win for efficiency, reducing “busywork” and enabling firms to focus on root‑cause improvement — while simultaneously giving the regulator higher‑quality insight into consumer harm risk. (FCA)

3. Case Study: Consumer Credit Firm Reacting to Data Trends

Scenario: A consumer credit provider notices in its consolidated complaints return that complaints related to loan payment communication are trending upward.

Under the New Policy:

The consolidated return makes this trend visible quickly because all complaint categories are in the same dataset.
The firm can use the complaints insight to redesign payment notices or borrower communications to reduce confusion and friction, potentially cutting the volume of these complaints in the next reporting period.
They can also use contextual data (e.g., number of active accounts) to show the trend isn’t simply due to growth in customers but may reflect process issues. (Solicitors Regulation Authority)

Commentary: This highlights how consolidated reporting can produce actionable insight, enabling firms to treat complaints as part of continuous customer experience improvement — rather than as a box‑ticking compliance exercise. (FCA)

4. Industry Commentary & Reactions

Positive Views from Compliance Professionals

Many compliance leaders welcome the new rules because they reduce administrative cost and reporting complexity, enabling more honest reflection on complaints and causes.
The FCA has stated that streamlining will help spot and respond faster to consumer harm as it arises — an important goal given ongoing market volatility. (FCA)

Expert comment: “Smarter regulation shouldn’t be more burdensome regulation. These reforms help align day‑to‑day reporting with meaningful risk identification and consumer protection,” according to industry analysts.

Concerns on Transition & Data Quality

Some firms may need to update internal systems to consolidate complaints data correctly under the new format.
There is a reputational angle: firms that historically logged high complaint volumes or slower resolution times may now have that data published publicly in a consistent format, raising brand risk.
Contextualisation (e.g., complaints per number of accounts) is critical — raw counts alone can be misleading. (Solicitors Regulation Authority)

Commentary: While many senior compliance officers see this as progress, operational teams must still ensure data accuracy and completeness in the new consolidated form — a non‑trivial task for firms with legacy systems.

5. Expert Broader Perspective

Regulatory Insight

The FCA frames this policy as part of a broader move towards data‑driven and proportionate regulation, reducing unnecessary burden while enhancing the usefulness of reported data for supervision.
Complaints data, especially when standardised, helps regulators spot systemic issues and emerging harm faster than fragmented data forms ever could. (FCA)

Firm‑Level Impacts

Larger firms (especially those with 500+ complaints) will also need to publish contextualised summaries of their complaints data — increasing transparency for consumers and stakeholders. (FCA)

Summary of Key Takeaways

Aspect	What It Means
Consolidated reporting	Replaces multiple returns with one consistent return for all complaints data. (FCA)
Data quality improvements	More consistent, comparable and predictive data for the FCA. (FCA)
Firm operational impact	Reduced admin burden, but increased need for good internal systems.
Transparency & accountability	Public disclosure of larger firms’ complaints summaries encourages better customer outcomes compliance. (FCA)

Final Commentary

The FCA’s reforms are designed to **shift complaints reporting from a compliance task to a risk intelligence tool, helping both regulators and firms understand root causes and trends rather than merely record counts. When implemented effectively, this can raise service quality and reduce consumer harm across the UK financial sector — which aligns with the overarching goals of the FCA’s Consumer Duty framework and smarter regulation initiatives. (FCA)