New £10m Fund to Boost UK Semiconductor Development

Author:

 


1. What is the fund?

  • On 24 September 2025, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) announced a new £10 million fund to support UK businesses developing the next-generation of semiconductors. (GOV.UK)
  • The fund is being delivered via Innovate UK (the UK government innovation agency) through its Technology Missions Fund (TMF) and other mechanisms. (wired-gov.net)
  • It is intended to support up to ~40 British businesses (as per the announcement) working on advanced chip technologies. (GOV.UK)
  • The fund targets companies working on technologies that underlie phones, cars, medical devices, renewable systems, defence/satellite systems etc. In particular, where the UK already has strengths. (GOV.UK)
  • Example companies cited: Paragraf Limited (graphene-based highly energy-efficient semiconductors) and Silicon Microgravity Limited (matchbox-sized navigation devices based on semiconductors) were named in the press release. (GOV.UK)

2. Why the fund – strategic importance

  • The UK government sees semiconductors as a strategic sector, vital to national security, supply-chain resilience, and high-tech manufacturing. The announcement says the chips underpin critical infrastructure: secure comms, satellites, defence, automotive, medical devices. (GOV.UK)
  • The global semiconductor market is huge (hundreds of billions of pounds) and the UK sector is projected to grow strongly — the announcement says UK semiconductor sector is “on track to grow by 75% by 2030”. (wired-gov.net)
  • The fund fits into the broader UK strategy on semiconductors — e.g., the 19 May 2023 “National Semiconductor Strategy” which set out up to £1 billion of government investment over the next decade in the sector. (GOV.UK)
  • By supporting local companies, the UK aims to build ‘sovereign’ capabilities, reduce dependence on overseas supply chains (which are vulnerable to disruption), and capture more value domestically. (GOV.UK)

3. How the fund works / eligible use-cases

  • The fund is intended for companies that are moving from lab to market: taking innovations in chip technologies (design, materials, novel semiconductors) through to commercialisation. (wired-gov.net)
  • Funding will provide access to: specialist ultra-clean semiconductor manufacturing facilities (for prototyping / small-scale production), technical expertise, business mentoring, and support in scaling innovations into commercial products. (GOV.UK)
  • The focus will be on “areas where the UK is strongest” — e.g., graphene-based devices, flexible/foundry technologies, advanced navigation semiconductors, power or compound semiconductors. E.g., Paragraf’s graphene-based devices were cited. (GOV.UK)
  • The fund is relatively modest (£10 m) meaning it is aimed at early-stage to mid-stage innovation rather than full-scale manufacturing plants (which cost hundreds of millions). It is about fuel for innovation rather than building entire fabs.
  • Up to ~40 businesses may receive support — so the average size per company would be in the hundreds of thousands to low-millions range (depending on allocation).

4. What this fund complements / the bigger ecosystem

  • Even though £10 m is relatively small in the context of chip manufacturing, it complements larger programmes:
    • The 19 May 2023 strategy sets out up to £1 billion of government investment over the next decade in UK semiconductor sector. (GOV.UK)
    • Earlier programmes: e.g., in March 2024, £35 m boost for UK semiconductor scientists and businesses (via EU’s Chips JU) was announced. (GOV.UK)
    • The government’s “ChipStart” incubator scheme supports semiconductor start-ups with mentoring, design tools etc. (though separate from this £10 m fund) (GOV.UK)

So this £10 m can be seen as one piece of a broader push: innovation + skills + manufacturing + supply-chain resilience.


5. Impact & beneficiaries

  • The fund is expected to boost high-skill job creation in the UK, particularly in advanced manufacturing and design of semiconductors. The announcement emphasizes “unlock new skilled jobs at home and boost our economy”. (GOV.UK)
  • It should help UK companies convert research breakthroughs (from universities and research labs) into commercial products and value capture in the UK, rather than exporting the IP or manufacturing abroad.
  • Support for “frontier technologies” — e.g., graphene-based semiconductors, advanced navigation semiconductors, flexible electronics – all areas the UK has research strength in.
  • Reinforces UK’s positioning in global semiconductor value chains, as a location for innovation (if not full mass-manufacturing) and design leadership.

6. Key questions, risks & limitations

  • Scale: £10 million is modest. Semiconductor manufacturing is extremely capital-intensive (fabs cost hundreds of millions to billions). So this fund won’t build large fabs but rather supports innovation/scale-up. This means outcomes depend on follow-on investment by private and public capital.
  • Manufacturing & supply chain: Innovation is only one part; manufacturing, equipment, materials, supply-chain logistics still dominate real cost and complexity. UK still lags major chip-manufacturing hubs (Taiwan, US, South Korea).
  • Time to market & competition: Global competition is fierce (US CHIPS Act, EU Chips Act, Asia). UK’s window for leadership is narrow. Getting from lab to commercial product is risky and long.
  • Skills and ecosystem: Even with funding, scaling requires a broad ecosystem (skilled engineers, fabs, suppliers). UK must ensure pipeline and infrastructure.
  • Commercial uptake & IP capture: Companies must capture value (not just design in UK, manufacture abroad) and build sustainable business models. Government funding helps but private capital and global partnerships will matter.
  • Geopolitical & supply-chain risks: Semiconductors are high on national-security agendas; UK must ensure it can navigate export controls, foreign investment scrutiny, global dependencies.
  • Measuring success: What metrics? Number of companies supported, jobs created, IP generated, new products commercialised – the government will need clear KPIs.

7. How to interpret this fund — what it tells us

  • It signals commitment: The UK is serious about semiconductors and is willing to inject targeted funding to stimulate its domestic sector.
  • It underscores the focus on innovation and design, possibly more so than full-scale manufacturing at this stage — consistent with UK comparative advantage (rather than trying to replicate low-cost mass fabrication).
  • It creates a pipeline: The fund is likely to stimulate startups and SMEs, help them gain traction so they can attract larger rounds, manufacturing investment, partnerships.
  • It plays into broader policy: fits with the UK’s “Plan for Change”, industrial strategy, strengthening growth-sectors, reducing supply-chain risk.
  • It is early stage in a long journey: While welcome, the £10m doesn’t change the global status overnight; it is one element of many needed to build a competitive semiconductor ecosystem in the UK.

8. What to watch / next steps

  • Announcement of beneficiaries: Which ~40 companies get selected? What technologies are supported (graphene, compound semiconductors, flexible, navigation chips, etc)?
  • Size of awards: How much funding per company? Will there be follow-on rounds or links to larger scale manufacturing funds?
  • Private co-investment: Are companies able to raise private capital + public funding? A strong indicator of ecosystem vitality.
  • Manufacturing & infrastructure links: Does the funding lead to partnerships with foundries, manufacturing equipment suppliers, prototyping facilities in UK?
  • Commercial outcomes: Within 1-3 years, do supported companies launch products or attract further investment?
  • Skills & job creation: Are new high-skill jobs created? Are university spin-outs commercialised?
  • Policy & incentives: Will the UK government introduce complementary incentives (tax breaks, manufacturing subsidies, energy cost support) to bolster the sector?
  • Global positioning / export successes: Do UK-based companies supported by the fund win international business?
  • Integration with larger strategy: How this fund links with the broader £1 billion semiconductor strategy and other infrastructure investment.

 

Here are some case studies and detailed commentary on the new £10 m UK fund to boost semiconductor development. They illustrate how the initiative might play out in practice and what the broader implications are.


Case Studies

1. Paragraf Limited (graphene-based semiconductors)

What they do: Paragraf develops energy-efficient semiconductor devices using graphene technology. The UK government announcement singles them out as a beneficiary of the £10m fund. (GOV.UK)
Use case via the fund: With support from this fund they could leverage access to ultra-clean manufacturing facilities plus technical/business mentoring to take their graphene devices from lab to commercial prototype. The government press release says the fund will “provide … access to specialist, ultra-clean semiconductor manufacturing facilities, technical expertise, and business mentoring”. (wired-gov.net)
Impact potential: If Paragraf succeeds, their devices could extend battery life in mobile phones, reduce energy consumption in cars/aircraft/defence systems — per the announcement. (GOV.UK)
Risks: Graphene devices still face scaling, manufacturing reproducibility and integration challenges; the fund is relatively small so this will likely support prototyping rather than full volume manufacture.


2. Silicon Microgravity Limited (matchbox-sized navigation semiconductor)

What they do: The press release highlights they will “create matchbox-sized navigation devices that can work without relying on satellite signals” for wearables, robots etc. (GOV.UK)
Use case via the fund: They could use the fund to refine chip design, integrate navigation algorithms, partner for manufacturing, and scale from R&D to product-ready chip.
Impact potential: These chips could strengthen UK’s independent navigation capability (reducing reliance on external GNSS systems) and serve emerging markets (IoT, robotics, wearable tech).
Risks: Navigation chips have strong competition globally; they’ll need IP, manufacturing scale, cost competitiveness and product-market fit.


3. Broader SME cohort (up to ~40 businesses)

What the fund provides: According to the announcement, the fund expects to support up to 40 British businesses focusing on “next generation semiconductor technologies”. (GOV.UK)
Implications: Many smaller UK-based semiconductor design or materials companies can use this as seed/early-stage funding. For example, firms working on flexible electronics, power semiconductors, compound semiconductors (areas where UK has strength) are referenced. (wired-gov.net)
Use case: A startup in, say, flexible electronics might use the fund to prototype its chip, validate performance and then raise private capital.
Risks: With limited funding per company (given £10m to ~40 firms), the amount per company will be modest, so many will still need follow-on investment and may struggle if ecosystem support (foundries, supply chain) is weak.


Comments & Analysis

A. Strategic significance

  • The fund signals the UK’s intention to build up its semiconductor innovation base, aligning with the broader National Semiconductor Strategy which commits up to £1 billion over the next decade. (GOV.UK)
  • It focuses on “areas where the UK is strongest” — such as advanced materials (graphene), design, navigation chips — which is a pragmatic approach rather than trying to replicate massive fabs overnight. (GOV.UK)
  • It may help with supply-chain resilience and national security (e.g., chips for defence/secure comms) — the press release explicitly ties semiconductor innovation to national resilience. (GOV.UK)

B. Opportunity & upside

  • For SMEs/startups in the UK, this fund lowers one barrier (early-stage funding + access to facilities) and can accelerate time-to-market from lab to prototype.
  • If successful, the UK could capture value in higher-margin segments of the semiconductor value chain (materials, design, niche chips) rather than just being a downstream buyer.
  • Jobs, skills and manufacturing spill-overs: the fund may help create high-skill roles and anchor talent domestically.

C. Constraints & risks

  • Scale: £10 m is relatively modest, given semiconductor manufacturing is extremely capital-intensive. One large fab costs hundreds of millions to billions. So this fund is early-stage support, not building entire fabs.
  • Manufacturing/scale-up gap: even with prototypes, moving to commercial volume manufacture requires foundries, supply-chain, equipment. UK must ensure ecosystem exists.
  • Follow-on investment: These companies will need substantial follow-on funding; the government’s fund alone won’t suffice for large scale.
  • Global competition: Other jurisdictions (US CHIPS act, EU Chips Act, Asia) are throwing massive support. The UK must ensure its pitch is differentiated.
  • Metrics of success: How many companies make it to commercial product? How much private investment is attracted? How many jobs created? The fund will require tracking progress.

D. Commentary: what to watch

  • Selection & pipeline: Which ~40 firms get supported? Are they genuinely innovative and capable of scale?
  • Award size & mechanism: What is the average award size? Are they grants, equity, convertible? How is the fund administered via Innovate UK/Technology Missions Fund? The press release says access to facilities and mentoring. (wired-gov.net)
  • Integration with infrastructure: Will these companies link to UK foundries, manufacturing lines, prototyping tools? The fund says access to “ultra-clean semiconductor manufacturing facilities”. Implementation matters.
  • Private sector co-investment: Are private investors using this as signal to invest? Are the funded companies raising meaningful follow-on rounds?
  • Export and value capture: Are the companies embedding significant UK value (jobs, IP) rather than just designing here and manufacturing abroad?
  • Longer-term strategy alignment: How does this fund tie into the larger £1 billion strategy and semiconductor ecosystem in the UK (skills, supply chain, manufacturing)?
  • Outcomes & success metrics: Over 1–3 years we should see prototype innovation, initial commercial deals, follow-on rounds, growth in jobs.
  • Global supply-chain & security angle: Since chips are strategic, how will this fund connect to national security, export controls, international partnerships? The press release gestures at that. (wired-gov.net)

Summary

The £10m fund is a targeted, early-stage boost for UK semiconductor innovation — focussed on helping firms get from lab to prototype/commercial product in areas of UK strength (graphene, navigation chips, etc). The two case studies (Paragraf and Silicon Microgravity) illustrate how specific companies might benefit.
It is a positive signal of UK commitment, but by itself will not transform the semiconductor sector overnight — success depends on follow-on investment, manufacturing ecosystem, global competitiveness, and effective execution.